Buy Essay Online in USA

Autism Parenting Stress Index

Function

Autism parenting stress, communication, closeness to child

Relevance

Autism spectrum disorders, development, social deficits

Target

Family and Child Welfare Service

Respondent

Adults

Feature

13 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.86

References

Cheung, T. C. K., & Yeung, C. K. (2021). A validation study of the Chinese version of the Autism Parenting Stress Index (C-APSI) in Hong Kong. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 83, 101762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2021.101762

Silva, L. M., & Schalock, M. (2012). Autism parenting stress index: Initial psychometric evidence. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 566-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1274-1

Autism Parenting Stress Index - userguide
ENG Autism Parenting Stress Index - userguide
CHT Autism Parenting Stress Index - userguide
CHS

Autism Parenting Stress Index - scale
ENG Autism Parenting Stress Index - scale
CHT Autism Parenting Stress Index - scale
CHS

Child Flourishing Scale

Function

Optimism, competence, engagement

Relevance

Positive relationships, emotional stability, Resilience

Target

Family and Child Welfare Service

Respondent

Child

Feature

11 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.87

References

Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110, 837-861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7

Lo, A. P. K., Fok, H. K., & Cheung, T. C. K. Meaningfulness in Kids’ Eyes: Validation of the Child Flourishing Scale in a Hong Kong Chinese Population (unpublished manuscript).

Child Flourishing Scale - userguide
ENG Child Flourishing Scale - userguide
CHT Child Flourishing Scale - userguide
CHS

Child Flourishing Scale - scale
ENG Child Flourishing Scale - scale
CHT Child Flourishing Scale - scale
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy

Function

Emotion experience, feelings, intimacy

Relevance

Perspective-taking, interpersonal relationship, prosocial behavior

Target

General

Respondent

Adults

Feature

11 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.68

References

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113

Siu, A. M., & Shek, D. T. (2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504270384

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - userguide
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - userguide
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - userguide
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - scale
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - scale
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Empathy - scale
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy

Function

Feelings, imagination, emotional involvement

Relevance

Mimicry, projection, reflection

Target

General

Respondent

Adults

Feature

4 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.65

References

Siu, A. M., & Shek, D. T. (2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504270384

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - userguide
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - userguide
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - userguide
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - scale
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - scale
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Fantasy - scale
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress

Function

Emotion expression, empathy, self-orientation

Relevance

Emotion contagion, negative emotions, emotion control

Target

General

Respondent

Adults

Feature

7 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.70

References

Siu, A. M., & Shek, D. T. (2005). Validation of the interpersonal reactivity index in a Chinese context. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(2), 118-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731504270384

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - userguide
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - userguide
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - userguide
CHS

Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - scale
ENG Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - scale
CHT Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Personal Stress - scale
CHS

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

Function

Self-confidence, resilience, self-efficacy

Relevance

Well-being, performance, life satisfaction

Target

General

Respondent

Adults

Feature

10 items in 4-point rating scale

Reliability

.76

References

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) [Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t01038-000

Yeung, K.C. (1998) The dynamics of interparental conflict and adolescent’s behavior problems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). https://doi.org/10.5353/th_b2980738

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - userguide
ENG Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - userguide
CHT Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - userguide
CHS

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - scale
ENG Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - scale
CHT Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale - scale
CHS

Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire

Function

Emotion experience, emotion recognition, empathy

Relevance

Trauma, well-being, perspective taking

Target

General

Respondent

Adults

Feature

16 items in 7-likert rating scale

Reliability

.81

References

Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1995). Facets of emotional expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(4), 555-568. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-b

Hutchison, A. N., Yeung, D. Y., Gerstein, L. H., & Wettersten, K. B. (2021). Psychometric comparison of Chinese and English versions of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire with bilingual Hong Kong Chinese students. International Journal of Psychology, 56(2), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12699

Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - userguide
ENG Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - userguide
CHT Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - userguide
CHS

Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - scale
ENG Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - scale
CHT Berkeley Expressivity Questionnaire - scale
CHS

Function

Social support, illness acceptance, family communication

Relevance

Illness, emotional support, relatedness

Target

Medical Social Services

Respondent

Adults

Feature

7 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.53

References

Winstead‐Fry, P., & Schultz, A. (1997). Psychometric analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General (FACT‐G) scale in a rural sample. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 79(12), 2446-2452. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970615)79:12%3C2446::aid-cncr23%3E3.0.co;2-q

Yu, C. L., Fielding, R., Chan, C. L., Tse, V. K., Choi, P. H., Lau, W. H., … & Sham, J. S. (2000). Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patients: A validation of the Chinese version of the functional assessment of cancer therapy–general (FACT‐G) scale. Cancer, 88(7), 1715-1727. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000401)88:7%3C1715::aid-cncr28%3E3.0.co;2-k

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General Scale: Physical Well-being Scale

Function

Energy, pain, medicine

Relevance

Physical condition, capability and illness, treatment evaluation

Target

Medical Social Services

Respondent

Adults

Feature

7 items in 5-point rating scale

Reliability

.75

References

Winstead‐Fry, P., & Schultz, A. (1997). Psychometric analysis of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy‐General (FACT‐G) scale in a rural sample. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, 79(12), 2446-2452. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970615)79:12%3C2446::aid-cncr23%3E3.0.co;2-q