A A A

If a program was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of funding for special groups for people with disabilities, what would be the indicators for this program evaluation?

Share:
Whtasapp
主題討論

Hello! I’m Dr. MEL. Nice to meet you! I’m absolutely excited that we are going to start this beautiful learning journey together and I’m sure you will find it fruitful and fulfilling. Feel free to share your thoughts here!

最近的活動討論

Got questions? Simply post them and let’s discuss! 

討論:Services for People with Disabilities
Mia Jason
2025年7月17日
If a program was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of funding for special groups for people with disabilities, what would be the indicators for this program evaluation?

If a program was aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of funding for special groups for people with disabilities, what would be the indicators for this program evaluation?

Reply
Like
Share
Whtasapp
Tessa Hayes
2025年7月17日

Cheers, and it's all good.

回覆
Like
分享
Whtasapp
Mia Jason
2025年7月17日

What a great and quick response! I'm grateful for your unwavering help.

回覆
Like
分享
Whtasapp
Tessa Hayes
2025年7月17日

When evaluating the effectiveness of funding programs for special groups of people with disabilities, several indicators can be considered. Here are five key indicators for program evaluation:
1. Financial accessibility: Assess the extent to which the funding programs enhance financial accessibility for special groups of people with disabilities. Indicators may include the number of individuals or organizations benefiting from the funding, the percentage of funding allocated specifically to special groups, and the reduction of financial barriers to accessing essential services or supports.
2. Impact on services and supports: Evaluate the impact of the funding on the availability and quality of services and supports for special groups. Indicators can include the expansion of service capacity, improved access to specialized programs, reduced waiting times, and increased availability of assistive technologies or accommodations.
3. Empowerment and inclusion: Measure the extent to which the funding programs promote empowerment and inclusion of special groups of people with disabilities. Indicators may include the involvement of special groups in decision-making processes, representation in program planning and implementation, and the development of initiatives that address the specific needs and concerns of these groups.
4. Collaboration and partnerships: Evaluate the effectiveness of collaborations and partnerships established through the funding programs. Indicators can include the number and diversity of partnerships formed, the level of collaboration between funders and service providers, and the leveraging of additional resources through partnerships to enhance outcomes for special groups.
5. Program sustainability: Assess the sustainability of the funding programs for special groups. Indicators may include the long-term viability and stability of the funding source, the establishment of mechanisms to monitor and evaluate program outcomes, and the adaptation of funding strategies based on ongoing assessments and feedback from special groups.

回覆
Like
分享
Whtasapp
最新討論帖
更多的討論帖
How can technology be effectively integrated into service evaluation for people with disabilities to enhance accessibility and inclusivity?
How can technology be effectively integrated into service evaluation for people with disabilities to enhance accessibility and inclusivity?
Wyatt Davis
2025年7月17日
3個回覆,0個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
What are the social and cultural factors that influence the perception and evaluation of services provided to people with disabilities?
What are the social and cultural factors that influence the perception and evaluation of services provided to people with disabilities?
Wyatt Davis
2025年7月17日
3個回覆,0個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
How can service evaluation be used to promote accountability and transparency in service provision for people with disabilities?
How can service evaluation be used to promote accountability and transparency in service provision for people with disabilities?
Wyatt Davis
2025年7月17日
3個回覆,0個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
What are the ethical considerations in conducting service evaluation research involving people with disabilities?
What are the ethical considerations in conducting service evaluation research involving people with disabilities?
Ava Robinson
2025年7月17日
3個回覆,0個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
精選討論帖
Hi, I realized that it seems the concept “outcome” is different from the term “output”. Taking the grandparent training project as an example, what is the “outcome’ referable?
Hi, I realized that it seems the concept "outcome" is different from the term "output". Taking the grandparent training project as an example, what is the “outcome’ referable?
CouldYip
2021年8月26日
7個回覆,47個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
I have designed a large-scale survey about the life satisfaction of low-income families in Hong Kong. Is it appropriate to use the electronic survey through mobile phones?
I have designed a large-scale survey about the life satisfaction of low-income families in Hong Kong. Is it appropriate to use the electronic survey through mobile phones?
Realistic
2021年8月20日
3個回覆,47個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
Questions about program evaluation and impact assessment (PE & IA)?
Dear MEL participants, Hello everyone! We are going to meet Prof. Aron Shlonsky this week (17&18 Oct). Do you have any problems or issues in program evaluation and impact assessment? Pleas ...
jml88min
2019年10月15日
0個回覆,69個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp
Question about the programme evaluation
Can someone recommend me a basic guide book for programme evaluation? We are an NGO in mainland China and providing services for young drug abusers in rural China. We learnt about your pro ...
Jessica
2019年10月9日
4個回覆,69個月前
Like
分享
Whtasapp