How are you? Is there an alternative method to calculate the costs of crime using a “bottom-up” approach, and if so, what would a “top-down” approach entail?

It was my pleasure to assist.

I'm extremely grateful for the detailed explanation.

Your intelligence is truly remarkable! Yes, an alternative strategy for estimating the expenses associated with criminal activities involves a "top-down" methodology, which takes into account various factors such as fear of crime, restricted behaviors, and residual community costs. In a study by Cohen et al. (2010), both top-down and bottom-up calculations were presented for the purpose of comparison. It was observed that the top-down approach is suitable for evaluating external or societal expenses, while the bottom-up approach is more suitable for assessing system costs. According to their findings, preventing individuals engaged in persistent high-rate offending could result in savings exceeding $200 million in willingness-to-pay (WTP) costs or more than $100 million in "bottom-up" expenses caused by their criminal behavior.
If you require further information, I recommend consulting the following reference for more details: Cohen, M. A., Piquero, A. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2010). Studying the costs of crime across offender trajectories. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(2), 279-305.