How to deal with situations if the indicator of self-efficacy shows an adverse influence on the perceptions of the capability to refuse peer’s sharing of cigarettes after cigarettes-related knowledge training on how to refuse cigarettes?

Welcome! Looking forward to our next chat.

Thanks very much.

If the indicator of self-efficacy shows adverse influence in terms of the perceptions of the capability to refuse peer's sharing of cigarettes after providing knowledge training on how to refuse cigarettes, it is important to address this situation to understand the underlying factors and make appropriate adjustments. Here's what you can do:
1. Analyze the training content and approach: Review the content and delivery of the knowledge training on refusing cigarettes. Assess whether the training adequately addressed the key factors related to self-efficacy, such as assertiveness skills, confidence-building strategies, and realistic scenarios. Evaluate if the training approach was engaging, interactive, and tailored to the participants' needs and characteristics.
2. Conduct qualitative assessments: Supplement the quantitative indicator data with qualitative assessments, such as interviews or focus groups, to gain a deeper understanding of participants' experiences and perceptions. Explore their thoughts, feelings, and challenges related to refusing peer's sharing of cigarettes. Qualitative insights can provide valuable context and shed light on factors that quantitative indicators may not capture.
3. Revisit the training approach: Based on the analysis of the training content, delivery, and participant feedback, consider revisiting the training approach. Determine if any modifications or enhancements are necessary to address the identified barriers and improve self-efficacy. This may involve incorporating more practical exercises, role-playing scenarios, or peer support components to strengthen participants' confidence and skills.
4. Monitor and evaluate progress: Implement a system to monitor participants' progress over time. Track changes in self-efficacy indicators and assess the effectiveness of any modifications made to the training approach. Regularly evaluate the impact of the program on participants' ability to refuse cigarettes and make necessary adjustments based on the findings.
5. Learn from the experience: Reflect on the adverse effectiveness of the self-efficacy indicator and learn from the experience. Consider the lessons learned in designing future interventions and evaluations. Use this opportunity to refine the program's approach, enhance the training content, and strengthen the support mechanisms to improve self-efficacy outcomes.